Inkster just signed up for 10 years of surveillance. The next day, a congresswoman came here to fight it.

INKSTER, Mich. On October 13, Inkster officials stood outside and announced the city is expanding its camera network under a contract that runs for the next decade.

On October 14, Rep. Rashida Tlaib stood in Inkster and introduced a bill in Congress to cut off federal money for exactly that kind of technology.

Two announcements, one day apart, in the same city. Here is what is actually being installed, who can look at the footage, and the question that has not been answered.

What the city is buying

The expansion runs under a program the city calls Safe City Inkster. According to WDIV Local 4, which covered the announcement, the package includes:

WXYZ reported the cost at roughly $241,000 a year. A council preview in June had put the figure near $240,000 annually after a first-year startup cost of about $76,000.

Most of the equipment is already installed. The drone is expected to be flying before the end of the year.

Mayor Byron Nolen framed the system as prevention, describing it as "preventing crime before it happens" and speeding up emergency response.

Who can look at the footage

This is the part that matters most to residents, and the city has put rules on paper.

An officer cannot browse the system. Searching Flock requires an active investigation and a case number attached to it. Routine data is deleted after 30 days unless it is preserved as evidence in a case.

Police Chief Tamika Jenkins said the department will run an audit tool that flags possible misuse for administrative review, and that an employee found violating the policy would not keep their job.

The city also says it will launch a transparency portal on its website in November, carrying statistics, the written policies, and an explanation of how the data is handled.

Why other cities are going the other direction

Inkster is expanding while several Metro Detroit communities are pausing or canceling their Flock contracts.

Part of that is a specific incident. Oakland County officials opened an investigation into a former sheriff's deputy accused of getting into Flock data after leaving the job. That is the scenario privacy advocates warn about: the rules are only as good as the enforcement behind them.

Chief Jenkins said Inkster had finalized its expansion before that case surfaced. She did not dispute that misuse happens, saying such incidents will occur and pointing to the audit system as the answer.

The bill, and whether it touches Inkster

The day after the announcement, Tlaib introduced the Get the Flock Out of Our Communities Act. As reported by CBS Detroit, it would bar federal funding from supporting the technology and require state and local governments to divest from these systems.

Here is the catch, and it is the open question in this story.

The divestment requirement, as reported, reaches cameras bought or operated with federal money. Inkster officials did not say how the expansion is being paid for. Until that is on the record, nobody can say whether a bill like this one would touch a single camera in this city.

A bill introduced is also not a law passed. It has to move through committee before any of this is more than a press conference.

What happens next

Three dates worth watching. The transparency portal is promised for November. The drone is expected to be operational before January. And the contract runs to 2036, which means a decision made this month binds a city council that has not been elected yet.

We have asked the city for the funding breakdown and the reader locations. We will publish them when we get them.

Know something about how this system is being used? Reach the newsroom through our tips page.